Michael Sonby ([info]crimsonjoe) wrote,
@ 2008-08-29 13:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: hopeful
Entry tags:politics

Veep pick- John McCain
I made my comments on Obama's pick for Biden. Now it's the GOP's turn, as John McCain named Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin to be his Vice President Choice.

Unlike Obama's pick, this is hardly a safe choice. Using the same four criteria that I used before:

1- If anything should happen to the President, could the VP step into the office and take over the duties as President?

2- Does the VP help the President with any perceived weaknesses of the Presidential candidate?

3- Will the VP nominee hurt the Presidential candidate?

4- Can the VP nominee help the Presidential nominee get elected?

(1)- The biggest problem. She's been mayor of a town, and Governor of Alaska for 2 years. I'll argue she has more experience than Obama does (and in terms of exceutive experience, has more experience than all of the other three). I'd really feel a lot better if she had more than one term as governor

(2)- She'll definitely help. She's a solid Conservative on the issues, while McCain has had problems with the base. She's a known battler of both corruption and pork spending (much better than the current administration). She helps with the GOP's problem of being a party of "Old White Men"

(3)- Could she hurt? Absolutely. She could be another Dan Quayle (a relatively unknown GOP rising star who wasn't ready for Presidential politics). From what I've seen, she's been very impressive. But she hasn't been put under the microscope like the other candidates. It's very possible she will make a verbal gaffe that will haunt her and McCain...

(4)- ... but she could also really help McCain win the election. Not that the VP pick alone will help someone win. But I've been checking with my fellow members of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy... they love this pick. They've been more excitied about this pick than anytime in the last 3-4 years.

This is a high-risk but high-reward move, for McCain and Palin. For the next two months, she's going to be put through the wringer. If she can handle the pressure, she will be a tremendous asset to McCain- and will set herself up for the future (my guess- if McCain loses and she does a good job, she's the nominee in 2012).

Would I have made this pick, if I were McCain? not if I thought I'd win without her. Gov. Palin is doing a great job in Alaska, but I'd want her to have another term before I'd put her on the ticket.

But I don't think McCain can win, as things stand now. McCain needed something to shake up the campaign (Obama, OTOH, just needed not to screw up). This qualifies. We'll see if it works out.

As a Conservative, I have hopeful trepidation. I want her to do well. But it's a gamble.




(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2008-08-29 10:09 pm UTC (link)
It's definitely a gamble, but you need to gamble when you're the underdog. I think it's a brilliant pick, and it neutralizes all of McCain's weaknesses with his age, the conservative base, and being seen as a Washington/status quo candidate without really creating any new problems. (Anyone who's worried about her experience would have the same worries about Obama's experience, so it's a push.)

It's also worth noting that McCain has already tried to court former Hillary Clinton supporters and ran ads suggesting Obama disrespected her - having a woman on the GOP ticket sends a message to those people, who would normally never consider voting for a Republican presidential candidate. For the first time in a while he's forcing Obama to play some defense. I still think he's the underdog, but I've always figured he had at least a chance to win and would certainly keep things competitive, and this helps. Both VP choices make sense - the frontrunner makes a safe pick, the challenger shakes things up.

John

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…